English Test – David Weinlick

“English Test – David Weinlick” is one among other English Tests that can help learners practice and get used to tests in English. These English Tests cover Reading, Language, and Writing. Take the test, check the answers, and see your level.

————–

1- How many Americans have ever considered asking friends or relatives to select their spouse for them? not very many. Yet this is exactly what David Weinlick did.

2- Weinlick had long been considering marriage and had known for quite some time that he was going to get married in June of 1998. When the wedding would take place and who would be invited he already knew. He just didn’t know whom he would be marrying. You see, he hadn’t met his bride yet. It all started some years ago. Friends would repeatedly ask Weinlick, an anthropology student at the University of Minnesota when he was going to tie the knot. He would say he didn’t know. Eventually, he got tired of these questions, so he just picked a date out of the blue: June 13, 1998. As this date was getting closer and closer, Weinlick, 28, knew he had to do something. His friend Steve Fletcher came up with the idea of a democratic selection process. Weinlick liked the picture, so he advertised for a bride on the Internet on a Bridal Nomination Committee website.

3- He created an application form and asked friends and relatives to interview the candidates and select the winner. They did this at a bridal candidate party before the ceremony on the day of the wedding.
Weinlick’s friends and relatives took the request quite seriously. Though Weinlick wasn’t sure who his bride would be, he did want to get married. He said he thinks commitment is essential and that people have to work at relationships to make them successful. Weinlick’s sister, Wenonah Wilms, said she thought that all of the candidates were nice but that she was looking for someone really special. Wilms added that it was important for her brother to marry someone who would fit into family celebrations like at Christmas.

4- So who won the election? It was Elizabeth Runze, a pharmacy student at the University of Minnesota. Runze hadn’t met Weinlick before she picked up a candidate survey on Monday before the wedding. They talked briefly on that day and again on Tuesday when Runze turned in the completed survey about her career plans and hobbies. However, neither Weinlick nor Runze knew who would ultimately be chosen by Weinlick’s friends and family on Saturday, the day of the wedding. After her Saturday selection by the committee, Runze said the day was the most incredible she ever experienced. Weinlick was happy too. After the selection, the groom said the plan had turned out almost exactly as he had hoped.

5- By the time the wedding day arrived, Weinlick had prepared everything: the rings, the musicians, his tuxedo, and the reception afterward. The two took their vows at the mall of America in Minneapolis while about 2,000 shoppers looked on from the upper levels of the mall.

6- Probably few Americans would do what Weinlick and Runze did. There have been reports, however, that the newlyweds are doing well. Weinlick and Runze’s union qualifies as an ”arranged marriage, ”afterward phenomenon that has traditionally not been popular in America. Arranged marriages are common in many other parts of the world, though, or at least they used to be. Maybe they’re not such a bad idea.

Comprehension (15 points)

A. Find a suitable title for this text: (2 pt):

…………………………………………

B. Are these sentences true or false? Justify. (3 pts).

1. Weinlick didn’t consider marriage for a long time before his wedding
2. They met several months before the wedding
3. Weinlick didn’t know who his bride would be until the day of the
   wedding

C . Answer the following questions. (3 pts).

1. What is new about this kind of marriage?
2. Who were to select the bride-winner candidate?
3. What do you think of “ arranged marriages“?

D. Find in the text words or phrases meaning the same as (4 pts)

1. Wife : (paragraph 1): ……………..
2. To get married: (paragraph 2): …………..
3. Suit : ( paragraph 3): ………….
4. New husband and wife:(paragraph 6): ……………..

E. What do the following words refer to in the text, (3 pts)

1. You (paragraph  2): ………………..
2. They (paragraph 4): ……………….
3. They (paragraph 6): ………….

Language (15 points)

A. Rewrite these sentences as suggested. (4 pts)

1. We should reduce unemployment.
   Unemployment………………………………..
2. “ Have we become fact-fanatics and info-junkies? ”
   Author Mark Griffiths questioned ……………………………………
3. “ Are you coming to the party ?”
   My friend asked me ………………………………
4. Students are organizing a trip next weekend.
   A trip………………………………

B. Fill in the blanks with the right phrasal verbs. (3 pts).
Put off- take off – pick up – look up – back up – turn down – let down.

1. You should always ……………. Important files and documents so that you won’t lose all your work if something goes wrong with your computer.
2. Young children ……………… the web jargon quickly and easily.
3. They ……………. The match because of the rain.

C. Match the words that go together to make appropriate collocations (3pts).

D. Give the correct form to the words in brackets (3 pts).

1. We should preserve our ( culture )……………….. heritage.
2. Everyone is obliged to be proud of his identity and his ( citizen ) …………………
3. We have to tolerate each other and ( belief) ……………… in everyone’s own capacities.

E. Put the verbs in brackets in the correct form. (2 pts).

1. I ( already / write ) …………………….. a report about the conference.
2. I ( travel ) ………………….. to Rabat next weekend

Writing (10 points)

What do you think of using the Internet at school? Write an article for your school magazine.

Test Answers